Toolkits
Here is a simple toolkit based on the Queenswood Oaks campaign which you are welcome to download and use:

Image credit JC Hermier
Online Resources
There’s lots of advice online to help in tree-saving campaigns:
- Friends of the Earth have provided some helpful advice on protecting trees and preseservation orders>>
- Community trees matter network have a webpage here with more detailed tree protection advice>>
- Urban landscape experts Green Blue have advice here for urban landscape professionals and residents alike with actions they can take to preserve and protect prized trees of all size and age
- There are lots of inspiring stories here from the Woodland Trust on protecting street trees >>
Advice On Tree Roots
Don’t be put off by insurers or local authorities telling you there’s no room for a root barrier to protect against subsidence. Root barriers were once thick layers of concrete, but not anymore. Obviously the vendors and specialist installers of root barriers take a very positive view of their potential but their experience might be useful to set against the often defeatist view of the technicians working for insurers. Check out these websites for more information:
- Here is a useful summary of root issues from Shire UK >>
- Also here which refers to case-studies and the use of root barriers in confined spaces.
- Company Hy-Tex discuss their root barrier solutions here >>
Straightforward Advice
Here’s some straightforward advice from our Tree warden in a format you can share:
Legal precedents
Traditionally insurance lawyers will cite the Kew Root survey of 1981 for legal guidance, but gradually things are changing and we think recent case law establishes three precedents:
- The question of reasonable foreseeability. If the tree owner could reasonably foresee the potential for a tree to cause damage but did not manage the situation, then it is liable. But if they did take action to mitigate the risk then liability is reduced or even eliminated
- The amenity value of trees is now being increasingly recognised by the courts, balanced against the risk of subsidence. This can help in the preservation of street trees, reducing council liability, provided the council can demonstrate a good programme of management of street trees, which takes account of risks.
- Expert opinion can often sway a court as to the extent to which subsidence or damage has been caused by trees, thereby reducing, but perhaps not entirely eliminating liability.
Here at SHIFT we have gathered together a number of legal precedents that a lawyer could use to support the case for retaining a tree:
- Kennedy v Bournemouth Borough Council, 17.09.12, Bournemouth County Court
- Robbins v Bexley London Borough Council, 17.10.13, Court of Appeal
- Berent v Family Mosaic Housing and London Borough of Islington [2012] EWCA Civ 961
- Khan and Khan v. (1) London Borough of Harrow; and (2) Helen Sheila Kane [2013] EWHC 2687 (TCC)
- Burge and another v Gloucestershire Council [2016] UKUT 300 (LC)
- Pattichis v London Borough of Enfield [2017 unreported)
There are also some interesting cases on the London Tree Officers website here >> and on this solicitor’s website>>. And here is a further relevant analysis from Weightmans>>
Useful Professional Contacts
Click to view their website
Peter Barry – Chartered surveyors or email: surveying@peterbarry.co.uk
SHIFT Action Plan For Haringey
SHIFT has created an action plan to improve the situation in Haringey.
JOIN US
Have you already been involved in a tree-saving campaign? If so, let us know!
If you have expertise in arboriculture, botany, structural engineering, PR, law or comms we would appreciate your help; we always welcome new ideas and team members.
Visit our contact page and say hello. >>

